Hitler had supreme authority as führer (leader or guide), but could not have risen to power or committed such atrocities on his own. During the course of the war, Nazi military forces rounded up and executed 11 million victims they deemed inferior or undesirable-“life unworthy of life”-among them Jews, Slavs, homosexuals, and Jehovah’s Witnesses. His invasion of Poland on September 1, 1939, triggered the European phase of World War II. Upon achieving power, Hitler smashed the nation’s democratic institutions and transformed Germany into a war state intent on conquering Europe for the benefit of the so-called Aryan race. He ruled absolutely until his death by suicide in April 1945. The main image was changed to better reflect the story.Adolf Hitler (ApApril 30, 1945) was appointed chancellor of Germany in 1933 following a series of electoral victories by the Nazi Party. This article was amended on 27 April 2023. “The Nazi regime misappropriated the sacred swastika symbol as a symbol of hate.” “The proposed legislation is critical to ensuring our democratic and multicultural values are not eroded, whilst simultaneously protecting our minority communities,” the Hindu Council of Australia’s submission said. Hindu groups also support the legislation, but urged the government to ensure religious groups were not prosecuted for displaying symbols that appear similar to the Nazi swastika. “Preventing Australia from becoming a haven for the use of symbols belonging to foreign neo-Nazi groups is a commonwealth responsibility and relevant to our standing in the international community,” the submission said. The Online Hate Prevention Institute, a charity focused on Holocaust denial and far-right extremism, said the federal government should not pass responsibility to states and territories. We use Google reCaptcha to protect our website and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. For more information see our Privacy Policy. Privacy Notice: Newsletters may contain info about charities, online ads, and content funded by outside parties. “We consider this to be a problem and one which could open the state up to unnecessary critique from far-right extremists for acting oppressively in a nontransparent way,” the council’s submission said. It said any decision to prosecute should be made by the director of public prosecutions and not by police. The New South Wales Council for Civil Liberties welcomed the bill but said it was a “symbolic at best” response to Nazi ideology, and expressed concerns about its implementation. “Our greatest concern remains the threat of lone individuals or small cells who could mobilise to violence and/or sabotage with little or no warning.” “While we remain concerned about ideologically motivated violent extremism, we assess that the vast majority of these extremists are more likely to focus on recruitment and radicalisation rather than attack planning in the foreseeable future,” the Asio submission said. It had peaked at a 50:50 split with religiously motivated extremism, years earlier. Some terrorism experts, including the Lowy Institute’s Lydia Khalil, have argued the ban could be counterproductive and provide neo-Nazi groups with more opportunities for provocation and propaganda.Įarlier this year, the Asio director general, Mike Burgess, said ideologically motivated violent extremism – mostly nationalist and racist violent extremism – represented about 30% of the agency’s priority caseload. Sign up for Guardian Australia’s free morning and afternoon email newsletters for your daily news roundup They also can transcend language, cultural and ethnic divides creating, distributing and understanding them is not limited to a select few or one cultural or language group.” “Extremist insignia an effective propaganda tool because they are easy to remember and understand.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |